Mirsen Alibašić *
ENDANGERING PERSONAL SAFETY BY CONCLUSIVE ACTIONS
Summary
A person's personal safety can be threatened in various ways, which happens often in reality, so the provisions of the Criminal Code that prescribe the criminal offense of Endangering safety, in addition to other criminal offenses, are of particular importance. It is indisputable that someone's safety can be threatened verbally, in writing, with signs, drawings, implicit actions and so this paperwork, with the help of judicial practice, investigates the forms of a qualified threat to the life and body of another person, which was made by implicit conclusive actions. The reasons for this are because conclusive actions cannot be interpreted linguistically and because they are different from other forms of behavior that can have many different meanings. At the same time, in court practice, the number of convictions for endangering safety by conclusive actions is significantly lower compared to convictions for endangering safety verbally. Therefore, the subject of this work is the research and analysis of the forms of conclusive actions that represent a threat in terms of the criminal offense of Endangering personal safety from Article 138 of the Criminal Code, as well as their relationship with the actions of other criminal offenses. The methods used in the work are the normative method, content analysis and case studies. The purpose of the research is to determine auxiliary criteria on the basis of which conclusive actions can be considered a threat, as well as to recognize in practice threats made in this way.
Key words: endangering personal safety, conclusive actions, threat, criminal offence.